clear sky chart

Job 9:9

Job 9:9-10
9 He is the Maker of the Bear and Orion,
the Pleiades and the constellations of the south.
10 He performs wonders that cannot be fathomed,
miracles that cannot be counted.

Tuesday, July 24, 2012

Messier 16 - Test Image For A New Processing Technique

Several months ago, a member of one of my email groups described a method of creating a false luminance image from an RGB image, enhancing it, and recombining it into the original image.  The result of this was to bring out faint nebulocity in the original image that was almost impossible to reveal simply by stretching the original histogram.  It does work, it does bring out features that were invisible (or nearly so) in the original image.  The procedure to do this was a complex manipulation of the luminance channel derived from the original RGB image.

I believe I have come up with a way of bringing out detail using a similar technique.  My variation on the LLRGB technique described above is much simpler to accomplish than the above procedure.  My goal was not necessarily to bring out nebulocity that is weak, but instead to enhance the brighter areas of the nebulocity, to bring out detail which has faded when using the curves/levels functions in Photoshop.  My method is good for emission nebula, which has most of its detail in the red channel.

I have used an image of the Eagle Nebula (M16) to demonstrate this simple procedure.

Here is the image, processed using the conventional means - Levels & Curves, and some of Neil Carboni's Astro tools.

 This is the original image, processed using the conventional methods.  The image consists of 25 - 90 second subs stacked with 10 darks and 20 flats using a Canon Digital Rebel (300D), modified for astro imaging.  I used an Astronomik CLS  clip in filter to cut down on my light pollution problem here at home.

This is the image, reporcessed from the same subs as the first image.  There is more nebulocity visible, however, the goal in the processing was to enhance the detail in the core.  I concentrated on that more than bringing out the fainter nebulocity.  No doubt that if I had tried, I probably could have brought out more of the fainter stuff, but that was not the goal in this exercise.

What I did in this image was to take the original RGB image, stretch the curves and levels, but not too extreme.  When the nebula is nicely visible in the image, I switched to channels, selected the RED channel only, selected and copied the red channel to a new image.  This  image is a monochrome (black and white) image of the red channel.

I enhanced this copy more with levels and curves, did some contrast curves, reduced star size and used an unsharp mask on the overall image.  Your processing technique might differ, as I'm not an expert at image processing.  The idea is to enhance the available detail.  You want to enhance the grayscale version to show as much detail as possible.

On the original RGB version which should still be open in another window, blur it slightly, and saturate the colors.  There are a few ways to do this, especially on an emission nebula, one of my favorite ways is to use curves on the red channel to enhance everything above the spike, while watching the total color histogram to make sure that you do not shift the overall color balance.  Tone down the red in the stars by rolling off some of the red at the right end of the curve.  It takes a little time with the curves, but you can get nice results.  You can also use lab color, just make certain if you use that method, that you go into the exposure and increase the offset before you do the Lab color thing.  Otherwise you can clip the red channel and ruin the image.

Once you have the color image saturated well, you can then go back to your monochrome image, select all of it, copy it and go back to the color image and paste the monochrome over the color image.  It will paste the monochrome as a layer.  Change the layer to a luminance layer.  I found that in my image, I just left the opacity to 100%.  If you need to back it down some, thats fine.  When youre happy, flatten the image, do some small touch up work on the finished image, and youre done.

Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Canon 300D First Light

Picked up a Canon Digital Rebel (300D) and removed the infrared blocking filter and tried it out last night.  The subject was NGC6992, a part of the Veil Nebula.  The image consists of 26 lights at 90 sec each, 10 darks and 10 flats.  The red sensitivity is incredible, as you can see in this image, taken from my light polluted backyard sky.  No filters were used...

Although the internal battery will only operate for about an hour, I'm pretty happy with this image.  If I were able to take double the frames, I think it would have been even more incredible.  I cant complain, however.

Tuesday, July 3, 2012

Scenic Vista Star Party

On June 23, My local club, the Mahoning Valley Astronomical Society hosted another star party at Scenic Vista, just West of Lisbon, OH.  It was cloudy on my way down to the location, but the weather map said it was going to clear up, so I attended.  It ended up being a perfect evening for astrophotography, and the visual guys were showing off many different objects to spectators.

I brought my 6" dobsonian and my C6NGT.  Early in the session, I was showing people the moon, Saturn, M57 and a few other objects.  When the public thinned out, I began photographing several different objects.

The first object, I wanted to get was another M51, as the one I got last time had that diffraction spike in it.  This time, my test image was absolutely perfect, so I snapped off 30 frames and ended up with this:

I am VERY happy with this image of M51.  Lots of weak nebulocity present, and no spike!

Next, I thought I'd try a few more difficult objects, they didnt come out as good as I'd liked, but I'll post them anyway.  The first is of the Crescent Nebula in Cygnus...

The nebula is visible, but the background star content is quite high.

Next we'll go with the Pelican Nebula, also in Cygnus.  This consists of very few frames because I didnt see a thing on the screen, but with some red channel stretching, I ended up with this...

Of course I didnt get all of it, as the object was larger than I expected.

Finally, I did a wide field Milky Way shot which came out OK.  Not the quality of some of the guys taking these images from truly dark sky locations, but not bad nonetheless...

This is the Milky Way in the Cygnus area.  The sky was too cloudy and bright south toward Sagittarius.